hnalogo.jpg (103481 bytes)

 

Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society

Home
Up
What Are Resource Lands?
Woodlot Resource To Non-Resource Lands
Evaluation: Internal Rate of Return - IRR
Top IRR Rated Agricultural Lands
Non-rated Soils & IRR System
Quasi-Judicial Plan Amendments
Compliance With Goal 3 -- Agricultural Lands
Compliance With Goal 4 - Forest Lands
Brown Report: IRR Zoning
Composite IRR

 

BROWN REPORT:  IRR ZONING

Brochure 9 in IRR Series

December 22, 2003

Land Use Committee
Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society
Member of the CACNA Coalition
__________

Policy 3, Goal 11, Josephine County Comprehensive Plan

Goal 11, Policy 3.B.(1). This Josephine County Comprehensive Plan (JCCP)1 policy permits requests involving changes for lands from a resource designation (i.e., woodlot resource) to a non-resource designation through the internal rate of return, or IRR procedure.2 The Hugo Neighborhood Association has concerns with the present application of the IRR system in the amendment process.3

Josephine County has 1,040,000 acres of land in 111 soils as defined by the Soil Survey.4 Sixty-seven (67) soils were identified as commercial forest soils (789,816 acres, 76% of Josephine County) and 46 were defined as agricultural lands by the Soil Survey.

IRR Zoning

The Brown Report2 assigned 56 soils of the county’s 111 soils defined by the Soil Survey a forest productivity rating (IRR); 55 soils were not rated by Brown. Twenty-six (26) (57%) of the 46 agricultural soils defined by the Soil Survey and 11 (16%) of the 67 forestry soils were not assigned an IRR rating by Brown.

The Brown Report made a zoning recommen-dation based upon its IRR ratings which was acknowledged as part of the JCCP. Soils below 3.50 IRR are considered unsuitable as forest lands (non-resource lands - JCCP, Goal 11, Policy 3.B.(1)); those with an IRR rating between 3.50 and 3.99 IRR are considered suitable for the Woodlot Resouce zone; and those soils having an IRR greater than 4.00 are considered suitable as commercial forest land.

Results Of IRR Zoning To Forestry Base

The IRR approach does not rate or eliminates 40 soils suitable for the production of commercial trees (Table 6, Soil Survey); they are considered non-resource lands by the county. The IRR approach also eliminates from consideration 26 agricultural soils (Table 5, Soil Survey) as having any forestry productivity potential (calculations not considered in this brochure).

The IRR approach identifies 12 soils as suitable for commercial forestry.

It identifies 15 soils suitable for the Woodlot Resource zone for a total of 27 soils with an IRR of 3.5 or greater and suitable for production of commercial trees. The 27 soils cover 373,402 (36 %) acres.

Conceptually, the IRR approach eliminates half of the economic forestry land base in the county - minus 416,414 acres of commercial forest land.

More Information. Would you like to learn more about citizen involvement in land use planning? Contact a member of the Land Use Committee of the Hugo Neighborhood.

Disclaimer. This brochure is as much about providing information and provoking questions as it is about opinions concerning the adequacy of findings of fact and land use decisions. It does not provide recommendations to citizens and it is not legal advice. It does not take the place of a lawyer. If citizens use information contained in this paper, its their personal responsibility to make sure that the facts and general information contained in it are applicable to their situation. (Link)

1. Josephine County. October 2000. The Comprehensive Plan For Josephine County. Grants Pass, OR.

2. Lawrence F. Brown. 1985. Using The Internal Rate Of Return To Rate Forest Soils For Applications In Land Use Planning. Grants Pass, OR.; Michael Snider. 1999. Locational Factors Affecting Woodlot Resource Lands. Josephine County Planning Office. Grants Pass, OR.

3. Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society. 2003. The IRR Series: What Are Resource Lands?, Woodlot Resource To Non-Resource Lands; Evaluation: Internal Rate of Return - IRR; Top IRR Rated Agricultural Lands; Non-rated Soils & IRR System; Quasi-Judicial Amendments, Compliance With Goal 3 - Agricultural Lands, Compliance With Goal 4 - Forest Lands, Brown Report: IRR Zoning, Composite IRR, and IRR. Grants Pass, OR.

4. United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Conservation Service. December 1983. Soil Survey of Josephine County, Oregon. (Presently the Natural Resources Conservation Service).

Back to Top

2012 Hugo Neighborhood Association & Historical Society